Mormons On TV MEO L.A.M. Norman Oetker Missionary “The Light Amidst the Mong/MEO” Hmong Thailand, Reynosa Mexico, English Class, St. Charles Missouri US.

Glenn Beck A Mormon On TV MEO L.A.M. Norman Oetker Missionary "The Light Amidst the Mong/MEO" Hmong Thailand, Reynosa Mexico, English Class, St. Charles Missouri US.


CONTACT:  October 2009


A Deception, Mormons Aren’t Christians, They Don’t Believe In The Bible, That Jesus Is God, Simply The Mormons Are A Fanatical Cult, Demonic.

If I were to say to you that my ancestors came from another "planet." What would you think?

Probably, in all likelihood, you would think I was somewhat crazy.

Then, if I was to go even further and say, that my ancestors even brought their wives from other planets here, along with plants and animals… I think after saying that, that you, would be wanting to get away from me as quickly as you could.

This is, but a very small part of the history, of yet another cult, named the Mormons. In light of these two, aforementioned ridiculous statements, it’s no wonder, that the gullibility of those then, to believe that ones eternal destiny would be found under a rock, by a unbeliever, posing as some sort of a Christian, Joseph Smith.

Mike Guthrie, a St. Charles Missouri policeman, said this and much more, I raised my hand and asked, how could you believe what they were telling you, he said, "the indoctrination started as a child in the Mormon Temple." 

Mike shared this, and much more of his firsthand experience, to us at this local inter denominational church in St. Charles Missouri, about being raised a Mormon.

Attending their university and after graduation, this born and raised Mormon meet his future to be wife, who was a Christian, and over and extended period of time, she was able to get Mike to think and rationalize by himself again.

Slow, but surely, he began weening off of this powerful demonic force, that like other cults, had an absolute mind control over it’s followers.

An interesting question could be pose, why does Glenn Beck manipulate conservatives through his TV show?

He could well talk the same things to wards the Liberals. He could gain their support simply by turning the focus to wards the Conservatives. Why doesn’t he do that? is it because he thinks that the Conservatives are morally on higher ground?

Again within these blocs I have written on Liberals, and they are not to be faulted, nor the Conservatives, it’s simply the people, who twist and turn everything, until what was a valid political view, is awash with corruption by those who have corrupted the system.

Mormons believe they are superior to all others, they firmly believe the "Mormon Temple," is the only true religious system. Again, why does Glenn Beck reach out to conservatives? My opinion is that, he knows that they are more gullible than the others. He can prevail by using common buzzwords, words common to Christians. He intends to make millions, and then, he will very subtlety lead those, who are disenfranchised with Christendom, and begin the slow process of indoctrination into the Mormon cult. They are in this to gain the political control.


In light of todays extreme religious wars, and especially those committing suicide, their promised reward is, that when they die, they will have all of the women they desire, in this so-called heavenly paradise, that the Muslim clerics espouse. 


As with all heathens, atheist, and infidels, including Mormons, there’s one common thread that ties them all together "SEX!" and that is, in all vileness, and their debased attitudes, toward all of the Christian Bible Doctrines.

First, this infidels, these unbelievers, this non Christians, these atheist, these cults, those that reject Christ as the only way of Salvation, they will rail against the Christian doctrines of the Christian Bible.

There is no sin, and man’s success’ and pleasures, are to be exalted.

The Mormons teach that Jesus was married three times, to different women, and had children, thus, the Mormons state that Jesus gives the example of POLYGAMY, as a common Mormon practice.

The Mormons are a cult, they are lead by a demonic spirit under Satan. They are not Christian.

There is an abundance of other first hand information on those who where able to break free of Mormon control on the Internet.

On to another cult activity:

Now, today, there is one on TV, on a favorite conservative station, his name is Glenn Beck. Glenn Beck states, that he is a Mormon, yet, when you listen to him, you think he is a normal kind of guy, that believes in God and country, and apple pie. You would think he’s just an ordinary Christian. Which is absolutely false.

The Mormons believe they are the true church, none other. They do not believe in the basic doctrines of the Bible, they created their own Book of Mormon,which is  utter rubbish.

Those who profess to be Christian are those who follow the teachings of Christ and the Apostles.

Mormons do not believe in the Trinity, three in one person. They don’t accept Jesus as the way of Salvation. They do not believe in Christ’s Redemption. They don’t accept the Christian Bible, as being from God, and, as the only true word of God.

Mormons are basically lead by an Anti Christ Spirit, readers it’s not necessary for you to agree with any thing I say, however, it will only take you minute to read from their own writings and experiences, what they believe, and it is Anti Bible! 

As a Christian missionary, I can speak to the truth, the Mormons do not believe the Bible, they unequivocally, and categorical deny the Christian held beliefs about God, as revealed in the Christian Bible. they believe they will become "God" when they die, that is if they are married in the Mormon Temple.

It’s all rubbish, absolute rubbish.


I had written previously about the deception of the Rev. Wright, who isn’t a Christian. I had described where his racists theology roots came from, as well as many other theologies.

When I meet people like him, or other cults like the Mormons, or those people who have been part of their congregation for years, there is a methodology to them all. They, these racists, these heathen, these non Christian Bible believers, all know the right words to say to others, they give the common phrases, that are familiar to Christians.

Leading one to believe that they, at least on the surface,  that they, are like them, thus, gaining their confidence. Thus, only to exploit them, for their own gain eventually. They will use them, and yet, return time, and time again, saying the same comforting phrases, to once again, gain these unsuspecting fellows good will.

 These false professor of Christianity, along with other cults, believe also, as that of the cultic Mormon Temple Doctrines, in that, being a "Mormon, is to achieve all that you can on the earth, for your earthly, worldly achievements, will gain you a higher privileged place in their Celestial Kingdom. 

Rev. Robert Hall writes about the infidels, those, that don’t believe in the God of the Christian Bible.

His points to several sins of these atheist, these unbelievers, in a sermon he wrote in the past, a couple points I

want to draw your attention to. "Vanity" and "Pride."

Rev. Robert Hall writes in part on VANITY and PRIDE.

…Revelation, by displaying the true character of God, affords a pure and perfect standard of virtue; heathenism, one in many respects defective and vicious; the fashionable skepticism of the present day, which excludes the belief of all superior powers, affords no standard at all. Human nature knows nothing better or higher than itself. All above and around it being shrouded in darkness, and the prospect confined to the tame realities of life, virtue has no room up wards to expand; nor are any excursions permitted into that unseen world, the true element of the great and good, by which it is fortified with motives equally calculated to satisfy the reason, to delight the fancy, and to impress the heart.

2. Modern infidelity not only tends to corrupt the moral taste; it also promotes the growth of those vices which are the most hostile to social happiness.

Of all the vices incident to human nature, the most destructive to society are vanity, ferocity, and unbridled sensuality ; and these are precisely the vices which infidelity is calculated to cherish.

That the love, fear, and habitual contemplation of a Being infinitely exalted, or, in other words, devotion, is adapted to promote a sober and moderate estimate of our own excellencies, is incontestable; nor is it less evident that the exclusion of such sentiments must be favorable to pride.


The criminality of pride will, perhaps, be less readily admitted; for though there is no vice so opposite to the spirit of Christianity, yet there is none which, even in the Christian world, has, under various pretenses, been treated with so much indulgence.

There is, it will be confessed, a delicate sensibility to character, a sober desire of reputation, a wish to possess the esteem of the wise and good, felt by the purest minds, which is at the farthest remove from arrogance or vanity. The humility of a noble mind scarcely dares to approve of itself, until it has secured the approbation of others. Very different is that restless desire of distinction, that passion for theatrical display, which inflames the heart and occupies the whole attention of vain men. This, of all the passions, is the most unsocial, avarice itself not excepted. The reason is plain. Property is a kind of good which may be more easily attained, and is capable of more minute subdivisions than fame. .

In the pursuit of wealth, men are led by an attention to their own interest to promote the welfare of each other; their advantages are reciprocal; the benefits which each is anxious to acquire for himself he reaps in the greatest abundance from the union and conjunction of society.

The pursuits of vanity are quite contrary. The portion of time and attention man find are willing to spare from their avocations and pleasures to devote to the admiration of each other is so small, that every successful adventurer is felt to have impaired the common stock.

The success of one is the disappointment of multitudes.

For though there be many rich, many virtuous, many wise men, fame must necessarily be the portion of but few.

Hence every vain man, every man in whom vanity is the ruling passion, regarding his rival as his enemy, is strongly tempted to rejoice in his miscarriage, and repine at his success.

Besides, as the passions are seldom seen in a simple, unmixed state, so vanity, when it succeeds, degenerates into arrogance.; when it is disappointed, (and it is often disappointed,) it is exasperated into malignity, and corrupted into envy.

In this stage the vain man commences a determined misanthropist. (A person who expects only the worst from people: cynic)

He detests that excellence which he cannot reach.

He detests his species, and longs to be revenged for the unpardonable injustice he has sustained in their insensibility to his merits.

He lives upon the calamities of the world; the vices and miseries of men are his element and his food.

Virtues, talents, and genius, are his natural enemies, which he persecutes with instinctive eagerness and unrelenting hostility.

There are who doubt the existence of such a disposition; but it certainly issues out of the dregs of disappointed vanity : a disease which taints and vitiates the whole character wherever it prevails.

It forms the heart to such a profound indifference to the welfare of others, that, whatever appearances he may assume, or however wide the circle of his seeming virtues may extend, you will infallibly find the vain man is his own centre.

Attentive only to himself, absorbed in the contemplation of his own perfections, instead of feeling tenderness for his fellow-creatures as members of the same family, as beings with whom he is appointed to act, to suffer, and to sympathize; he considers life as a stage on which he is performing a part, and mankind in no other light than spectators.

Whether he smiles or frowns whether his path is adorned with the rays of beneficence, or his steps are dyed in blood, an attention to self is the spring of every movement, and the jnotive to which every action is referred. 

 N. Oetker

In closing, for those who watch Glenn Beck, though he’s clever and witty, yet, one needs to remember, he believes his ancestors came from another planet….ummm…ummm….ummm maybe from.. "obamaworld."   Don't tell anyone

All jokes aside, Christians be aware, He doesn’t believe in any of the things of Christianity, nor, does He accept the Bible, as God’s Word to man.

Glenn Beck has another agenda! the recruitment to the Mormon Temple, to the unsuspecting, he, Glenn Beck, either is a willing participant, with this Mormon Temple Cult, or, as he says about the President, that he, Glenn Beck, is surrounding around himself, these non Christian, mind controlling, demonic cult  members, from the Mormon Temple.

Missionary Norm 

Mormons On TV MEO L.A.M. Norman Oetker Missionary "The Light Amidst the Mong/MEO" Hmong Thailand, Reynosa Mexico, English Class, St. Charles Missouri US. 

Jehovah Witnesses MEO L.A.M. Norman Oetker Missionary “The Light Amidst the Mong/MEO” Hmong Thailand, Reynosa Mexico, English Class, St. Charles Missouri US.

 Jehovah Witness MEO L.A.M. Norman Oetker Missionary "The Light Amidst the Mong/MEO" Hmong Thailand, Reynosa Mexico, English Class, St. Charles Missouri US.


CONTACT:  October 2009

October 2009, there are many false cults in the world today. The JW’s are here in force, in Reynosa Mexico.
They’re preyed upon by those from the states, who, for the most part have a educational advantage.
These are good people here, as in other parts of the world, who have had, for the most part,
a negative experience in the past, with religion.


These, like so many others, are also, simply the lost, these, are those, that we, as Christians, are also obligated, to share the truth in Christ with.

I have decided to include in this article, a copy from another site, showing just how things are changed, in their bible, through the manipulation of God’s Word, the Christian Bible.

Now, to go toe to toe with a J.W. on scripture, is a very tiresome ordeal. You’ll soon find, that they have a very set way, to their madness.

They use the same scriptures over and over. The scriptures that they use, aren’t exactly correct, they are in fact, incorrect, and thus, they introduce a "lie,"as you will see below.

Howbeit, the point I want to leave you with is this, you must asked them about different scriptures as they are talking, you must inject, into their mantras, with your questions, in regards to other related scriptures, you must continually force those- that are involved in this erroneous, false doctrine to “Think!”

To think for themselves AGAIN! The mind control, that is exerted over them, can be broken, by asking them question, on a whole host of issues, family, friends, doctrines. And, that, they, through time, and patience must regain the capacity to think independently for themselves, and when they do, that is when the mind control will be lessened. They then will reach a point, that the realization, that they have in fact, been under the control, of a control group.

This technique will work on the Christian, as well as a non Christians.

In the end, it’s our own free will, deciding the course for each of us though.

Below are some of the changes that the JW’s made, as you know, they have written their own bible. When reading through these changes below, you will then see, their false doctines plainly. Why?

Why do people go into cults, the naked truth is, when you peel everything away, it is that they enjoy "sin,"and it’s short lived pleasures. 

Rather than to have, "Holiness and Truth," to the only true God, and His Salvation, through "Jesus." This Salvation is for all of mankind, delivered by the Holy Spirit, which is revealed in the Chrstian Bible as the only plan, the only way to Salvation.  Salvation is for man, to be reconciled to God, through "Jesus,"and Calvary’s Cross. The Only Way Of Salavtion.

People enjoy the pleasures of sin.

Missionary Norm

First and most obviously to anyone who has looked at the NWT is the appearance of JEHOVAH in the NT portion over two hundred times where the Greek text has KURIOS (LORD). The second way in which the NWT has systematically abused the divine names or titles is in its handling of text in which Jesus is called God (Isa 9:6; John 1:1,18; 20:28; Rom 9:5; Titus 2:13; Heb. 1:8; 2 Peter 1:1; 1 John 5:20; Acts 20:28), of these, the NWT translates four so that Jesus is not called God at all (Rom 9:5; Titus 2:13; Heb. 1:8; 2 Peter 1:1), and two so that he is "A god" or "god" (John 1:1, 18). The remaining three texts (Isa 9:6; John 20:28; 1 John 5:20), are not mistranslated, but are interpreted so that either Jesus is not called God at all or he is called God only in a lesser sense. In short, wherever possible, the NWT translates texts that call Jesus God in such a way as to keep the text from making that identification!

Genesis 1:2

"Spirit of God" changed to "God’s active force."

The revision modifies the original noun with a more impersonal form as the JWs reject the orthodox Christian belief in the personality of the Holy Spirit.

Exodus 3:14

"I am" changed to "I shall prove to be."

The revision clouds the connection between God’s self proclaimed title and Jesus’ proclamation of being the same in John 8:58, as the JW rejects the deity of Jesus.

Numbers 1:52

"Under his own standard" changed to "by his [three-tribe] division."

The Hebrew word degal translated as "standard" literally means flag or banner. Since the JWs regard saluting a flag as an act of idolatry, the text has been altered according to their doctrinal bias. (Same revision found in Num. 2:2, 3, 10, 18, 25; 10: 14, 18, 22, 25.)

Isaiah 43:10

"Nor will there be one after me" changed to "after me there continued to be none."

The original future tense of the verb indicates that there will never be another being sharing in God’s divinity. The altered tense suggests credibility to the JW doctrine of Jesus’ becoming a "mighty god" while still being less than Jehovah in nature. (See the John 1: I discussion below for another expression of this JW distortion.)

Ecclesiastes 12:7

"The spirit returns" changed to "the spirit itself returns."

The passage indicates the return of a human spirit to God after death. Since the JWs believe in an unconscious state after death, "itself’ has been inserted to suggest a more impersonal reference to spirit.

Matthew 2:11

"Bowed down and worshipped him" changed to "did obeisance to it"

The JWs evade recognizing Jesus as worthy of worship as a divine being by altering the form of honor that he receives from men and angels. The Greek word proskuneo literally means "worship." The use of "obeisance" is a NWT adaptation. (Same revision found in Matt. 8:2; 9:18, 14:33; 15:25; 28:9, 17; Mark 5:6; 15:19; Luke 24:52; John 9:38; Heb. 1:6.)

Matthew 5:19

"Least in the kingdom of heaven" changed to "least in relation to the kingdom of the heaven."

The passage indicates that a disobedient believer who sins can still find forgiveness and eternal life. The JWs believe heaven is reserved for only 144,000 specially designated servants of God. The revision suggests more separation between these groups through a status hierarchy.

Matthew 25:46

"Eternal punishment" changed to "everlasting cutting-off."

The Greek word kolasis translated "punishment" indicates continuous torment, but the NWT revision suggests "termination," as the JWs promote the doctrine of annihilationism regarding condemned souls.

Mark 1:4

"Baptism of repentance" changed to "baptism [in symbol] of repentance. "

Nothing in the original Greek text justifies the insertion of "in symbol." The revision undermines the significance of John the Baptist’s ministry, the Jewish meaning of baptism and the Christian sacrament of baptism in contrast to the more regimented JW baptism requirements.

Luke 12:8

"Acknowledges me" changed to "confesses union with me."

The addition of "union" suggest something more than what the original Greek actually states and adds further credibility to the NWT distortion presented in John 6:56 below.

Luke 23:43

‘Today you will be with me" changed to "I tell you today, You will be with me."

Jesus assured the thief on the cross that their spirits would soon enter the spiritual/heavenly realm together. As the JWs reject the belief in the conscious survival of the human spirit after death, their revision suggests that "today" deals with the time of the statement rather than the relocation of their spirits.

John 1:1

"Word was God" changed to "Word was a god."

The JWs reject the orthodox Christian belief in the deity of Jesus. The revision asserts that Jesus was someone other than God Himself.

John 1:12

"Believe" changed to "exercise faith."

The orthodox Christian doctrine of spiritual justification and rebirth before God by belief in Jesus is in conflict with the JW doctrine of salvation by works (i.e., obedience to their organization). The revision attempts to describe salvation as a continuous process rather than a radical encounter and transition (Same revision found in John 3:16, 18; 6:29; Rom. 4:3, 10:4, 9, 10.)

John 6:56

"Remains in me" changed to "remains in union with me."

The mystical union between the individual human spirit and the Spirit of Jesus is obscured by restructuring "in" with a compound form. The substitution implies more separation between a Christian and Jesus. (Same revision found in John 14:20; Rom. 8:1, 2, 10; 12:5; 2 Cor. 5:17; Gal. 3:28; Eph. 1:13*; 2:10, 13, 15, 21, 22; 3:6; Col. 1:14*, 16*, 27; 2:6, 10*, 11, 12*; 3:3; 1 Thes. 4:16; 5:18; 1 John 3:24; 4:4; 5:20. Verses with an asterisk (*) indicate where the revision uses "by means of" or "in relationship to" rather than "in union with.")

John 8:58

"I am" changed to "I have been."

Same intent as described in Exodus 3:14 above.

John 14:14

"IF YOU ask [me] anything in my name, I will do it."

"me" is omitted to deny the fact we pray to Jesus.

John 14:14

should also be mentioned. In the NWT this reads; "IF YOU ask anything in my name, I will do it." The Greek text in the KIT, however, has ME after ask, so that it should be translated; "If you ask ME anything in my name, I will do it." It is true that some later Greek manuscripts omitted this word, but most of the earlier ones include it, and most modern editions of the Greek NT include it. At the very least, the NWT ought to have mentioned this in a note!

John 14:17

"Beholds him or knows him" changed to "beholds it or knows it."

The revision ignores the context of the pronoun with the Comforter role in the preceding verse to deny the personality of the Holy Spirit.

John 17:5

"Glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you" changed to "glorify me alongside yourself with the glory that I had alongside you."

The original text reflects the shared deity of God the Father and Jesus before the creation of the world, but the revision suggests different natures as implied by different states of glory.

John 17:21

"Are in me" changed to "are in union with me."

The original statement by Jesus indicates his shared deity with the Father. The revision undermines this by suggesting a greater separation between them.

Acts 10:36

"Lord of all" changed to "Lord of all [others]."

The revision suggests that even though Jesus is highly honored, he is still one among many of God’s created beings. (Similar revisions found in Rom. 8:32; Phil. 2:9; Col. 1: 16-17.)

Acts 20:28

They change "God purchased the church with His own blood" to God purchased the church with the blood of His son"

Wrath and indignation will come to every Jw from the Governing Body, who even suggests God purchased the church with His own blood… the blood of Jesus… who is God!

Romans 2:29

"By the Spirit" changed to "by spirit."

Although the definite article ‘the" does not literally appear in the Greek, it is implied by the form that (pneuma) appears in. The revision, however, translates pneuma in a more abstract form to evade the reality of the Holy Spirit. (Same revision found in Rom. 15:19; Eph. 2:22; 3:5; Titus 3:5; James 2:26; 2 Peter 1:21.)

Rom 8:1

"Therefore those in union with Christ Jesus have no condemnation," Which omits the word NOW.

The NWT omits key words when to include them may contradict JW doctrine. The most glaring example is Rom 8:1 "Therefore those in union with Christ Jesus have no condemnation," Which omits the word NOW. This omission is evidently motivated by the fact that the JW’s do not believe anyone can claim NOW to be free of condemnation.

Romans 8:23a

"Have the firstfruits of the Spirit" changed to "have the firstfruits, namely the spirit."

This represents another form of disguising the separate personality of the Holy Spirit as in Rom. 2:29 above. The original text refers to the derivatives of the Spirit, but the revision identifies the spirit as a derivative.

Romans 8:23b

"The redemption of our bodies" changed to "the release from our bodies by ransom."

This revision avoids the suggestion that there is continuity of either body or soul after death. Their teaching that the soul ceases to exist at the death of the body precludes the ownership of, or relationship to, a body that must be redeemed.

Romans 8:28

"All things" changed to "all his works."

The revision undermines the sovereignty of God by suggesting that He controls only the things He is directly involved in doing. This implies that God does not work ALL things together for the good of those that love God, but only those things which he himself does, over which he has control.

Romans 8:29

"Those God foreknew" changed to "those whom he gave his first recognition."

The revision obscures the nature of God’s knowledge and power as a first recognition may or may not be foreknowledge.

Romans 9:5

"Christ, who is God over all, forever praised!" changed to "Christ, [sprang] according to the flesh: God who is over all, [be] blessed forever."

The direction proclamation that Christ is God is obscured by the altered text.

Romans 10:13

"Lord" changed to "Jehovah."

This revision obscures the fact that the Lord referred to in verse 13 is the same Lord called Jesus in verse 9. Since the JWs reject the deity of Jesus, the revision is made accordingly. The Greek word, kurios, translated "Lord" has been revised to "Jehovah" over 200 times in the NWT. The JWs insist that this is the only valid title for God, even though Greek-speaking Jews used "Lord" and "God" in place of "Yahweh" (the source of "Jehovah") throughout their Septuagint translation of the Old Testament. Furthermore, the Bible contains dozens of names for God other than Lord, Yahweh, or Jehovah.

Romans 13:1

"Authorities that exist have been established by God" changed to "authorities stand placed in their relative positions by God."

Since the JW regard saluting a flag, military service and similar forms of submission to government as idolatry, they have added words to the text to weaken the proclaimed authority of government.

1 Corinthians 6:19

"Your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit" changed to "the body of YOU people is [the] temple of the holy spirit."

To avoid recognition of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in the individual believer, the revision modifies "body" to a more collective form in harmony with the opposing JW doctrine.

1 Corinthians 10:4

"The Rock was Christ" changed to "that rock-mass meant the Christ."

The passage depicts the preincarnate Jesus exhibiting his divine nature by being present many centuries earlier. This revision tries to conceal his eternal nature with a more figurative interpretation of "the Rock."

1 Corinthians 12:11

"As he determines" changed to "as it wills."

The NWT finds many ways to disguise the personality of the Holy Spirit. In this case the third person pronoun exercising individual conscience and will is replaced with an impersonal pronoun.

1 Corinthians 14:14-16

"Spirit" changed to "[gift of the] spirit."

Like several other Biblical passages, this one indicates the distinctive presence of the human spirit as distinguished from the mind and body. The JWs evade these distinctions and try to disguise them with related revisions.

The phrase GIFT OF THE is added in brackets five times, changing "SPIRIT" to "[GIFT OF THE] SPIRIT." The NWT elsewhere frequently paraphrases the simple word SPIRIT, especially when referring to the immaterial aspect of human nature, to avoid the implication that such a spirit has a reality distinct from the body. For instance, Heb 12:19 "the Father of spirits" (or the spirits) becomes "the Father of OUR SPIRITUAL LIFE." In Gal. 6:18 "your spirit" is paraphrased "THE SPIRIT YOU SHOW." Similar rewording’s are introduced in passages where the simple translation of "spirit" or "Spirit" might imply that God’s Spirit is a person, contrary to the JW’s doctrine that the Holy Spirit is God’s "active force." So, Jude’s description of certain men as "not having the Spirit" (or more literally, not having spirit") is rendered "NOT HAVING SPIRITUALITY" (Jude 19).

1 Corinthians 15:2

"By this gospel you are saved" changed to "through which YOU are also being saved."

Similar to the Acts 16:30 revision above, this one again obscures the completeness of salvation by grace. The JW’s salvation exists as an extended process ("being saved") with the outcome being uncertain until final judgment before Jehovah.

Galatians 6:18

"Your spirit" changed to "the spirit YOU [show]."

Similar to the I Cor. 14 revision above, this one attempts to obscure the reality of the individual human spirit by presenting it more as an attitude of action than an entity.

Philippians 1:23

"To depart and be with Christ" changed to "the releasing and the being with Christ."

Paul’s eagerness indicates that the believer’s spirit goes immediately into Christ’s presence at death. The revision suggests that death and being with Christ are two separate steps in an extended process, as the JWs believe in soul sleep (i.e., the unconscious state of the human spirit awaiting the resurrection).

In Phil 1:23-24 several words are added without brackets that, along with some other changes, completely alter the structure and thereby also the meaning of the text. The passage reads in the NWT (with added words in brackets so you can see here) "I am under pressure from [THESE] two things; [BUT WHAT] I do desire is the releasing and the being with Christ, for this, [TO BE SURE], is far better." There are other errors as well, but the additions indicate here clearly change the meaning so as to avoid the test’s implication that Paul would be with Christ after death. Some of the additions in brackets in the NWT so clearly change the meaning it is a wonder that more JW’s don’t question them? In 1Cor 14:12-16 the phrase GIFT OF THE is added in brackets five times, changing "spirit" to "[GIFT OF THE] spirit." The result is that Paul’s contrast between his own personal "spirit" and his "mind" is removed. To assure that this contrast is missed, the word "MY" is also added in brackets before "MIND" twice in verse 15 but not before SPIRIT. Thus the simple contrast between "the spirit" and "the mind" (or "my spirit" and "my mind" NASB) is changed to "the [GIFT OF THE] spirit" and [MY] mind."

Phil 2:6

"Although Jesus existed in the form of God, He did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself" (He grasped equality and let it go to become a man) has been changed to "although Jesus was existing in God’s form, he gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God."

NWT teaches that Jesus was never equal with God nor did he ever grasp at it. Notice the word seizure, which implies grabbing that which is not yours to grab ie equality. If Jesus was created by God, why would He be considered humble for not thinking of himself as equal to God. That is not humility, but reality! However since Jesus was equal to God, it would require great humility to give up his status as God and become a man through Mary.

Col 1:16-20

the word "[other]" has been added 5 times where it is not in the Greek

Awful embarrassing for Jw’s to read this verse with the [other] removed. Why it would mean Jesus was not a creature but God. By adding "other" to "all other things" Jw’s attempt to avoid the obvious original intent of the Greek that Jesus is above all created things implying Jesus is not a creature!

The addition of the word OTHER is usually justified by an appeal to such texts as Luke 11:41-42 and Luke 13:2,4, where the word OTHER is also added after the word ALL. However, in these passages (and in others were the same practice is rightly followed) the addition of the word OTHER doesn’t change the meaning, but simply makes it read smoother. In Col 1:16-20, however, whether one adds "OTHER" makes a great deal of difference to the meaning! What is so often noticed is that the NWT does this same thing in several other passages as well (Acts 10:36; Rom 8:32; Phil 2:9). In Rom 8:32, the word OTHER is not even placed in brackets, contrary to the work’s stated practice. In all of these text, the intent seems to be to undermine the implication of the text that Jesus Christ is God.

Colossians 1:19

"His fullness" changed to "fullness."

The definite Greek article (to), translated "his," indicates that Jesus shares the Father’s divine nature as also shown in Col. 2:9. The revisions evade the truth by concealing the similarity of the two passages.

Also notable is Col 1:19 "because [God] saw good for all fullness to dwell in him." Here the little word THE is omitted before FULLNESS. This is significant, because NWT renders "ALL FULLNESS" is ambiguous, whereas "ALL THE FULLNESS" clearly refers to the fullness of God’s own being (compare Col 2:9).

Col 2:6-12

Again, in Col 2:6-12 "IN HIM" and "IN WHOM" (en auto, en ho) becomes "IN UNION WITH HIM" (v.6) "IN HIM" (V.V. 7,9) "BY MEANS OF HIM" (V. 10) and "BY RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM" (V.V..11,12). These variations serve only JW doctrine! They have no other purpose, they undermine the unity of the passage, which is that Christian life consists solely of a supernatural relationship with God through faith in Christ. There are many other passages where IN is paraphrased to avoid the otherwise clear meaning of the text. For example, In Matt. 5:19 IN becomes "IN RELATION TO" so as to avoid the passages teaching that some who disobey the law’s commandments and teach others to do so will nevertheless be accepted "in the kingdom of heaven" (which JW’s believe will be restricted to the 144,000 special chosen and sanctified believers).

Colossians 2:9

"The fullness of deity" changed to "the fullness of the divine quality."

The Greek theotes, translated "deity," literally means divine essence or divinity. As the JWs reject the divine nature of Jesus, a revision is inserted to suggest that Jesus is limited to only divine-like characteristics.

I Timothy 4:1

"The Spirit" changed to "the inspired utterance."

This revision attempts to obscure the reality and activity of the Holy Spirit by representing it as a message instead of an entity. (Similar revisions found in 1 John 4:1, 3, 6 with "expression" being utilized in place of "utterance.") A straightforward "the SPIRIT says" would too obviously imply the personality of the "Spirit".

Titus 2:13

"Our great God and Savior Jesus Christ" changed to "the great God and of [the] Savior of us, Christ Jesus."

Similar to the Rom. 9:5 revision shown above, a distinct proclamation of Jesus as God is obscured by the altered text. (Similar rewording also found in 2 Peter 1:1.)

Hebrews 1:6

"But when He again brings his First-born into the inhabited earth, he says: ‘And let all God’s angels worship him’ ." (New World Translation, 1950, 1961, 1970 editions,

The NWT revised 1971 edition was changed to read, "do obeisance to" rather than "worship". This change remains to this day, even though the original word chosen by the 4 NWT translators, was accurate to the Greek. However the Watchtower society was losing so may new converts because of the word "worship" (only God gets worshipped) that they did the typically dishonorable thing and chose the obscure unknown word "obeisance" to complete the deception of new converts.

Hebrews 1:8

"Your throne, 0 God" changed to "God is your throne."

The revision avoids addressing the Son, Jesus, as God to validate the JWs’ rejection of his divine nature.

Hebrews 9:14

"The eternal Spirit" changed to "an everlasting spirit."

Similar to the Rom. 2:29 revision above, the switching of the article before the adjective represents the work of the Holy Spirit in a more indirect/ impersonal manner.

Hebrews 12:9

"Father of our spirits" changed to "Father of our spiritual life."

Similar to the I Cor. 14 revision shown above, this one tries to obscure the distinctive reality of human spirits by replacing them with a more abstract noun.

Hebrews 12:23

"The spirits of righteous men" changed to "the spiritual lives of righteous ones."

This revision represents the same noun-switching as described in Heb. 12:9 above.

Hebrews 12:28

"We are receiving a kingdom" changed to "we are to receive a kingdom."

An orthodox Christian understanding of the Kingdom recognizes it as primarily established through Jesus’ victorious death, then further through post-resurrection displays of his power, and perpetually through the addition of new believers into God’s family. The JWs teach that Jesus’ Kingdom did not begin until his invisible return in 1914. The form of the Greek word for "receiving" (paralambano) implies a current condition, but the revision suggests a future event according to the JW doctrine.

1 Peter 1:11

"Spirit of Christ in them was pointing" changed to "the spirit in them was indicating concerning Christ."

Another example of the supernatural presence of Jesus in the life of a Christian is obscured again by this revision as the JW doctrinal view presents him as more limited.

I Peter 3:18-19

"By the Spirit, through whom" changed to "in the spirit. In this [state]."

Similar to several examples presented above, in this passage the presence and personality of the Holy Spirit is obscured with a more abstract representation of the Holy Spirit to accommodate the JW doctrine.

1 John 4:1-6

"Spirit" changed to "inspired expression"

Even clearer is 1 John 4:1-6. John has just stated that we know our union with God is secure "owing to the spirit which he gave us" (3:24). The next sentence in the NWT reads; "Beloved ones, believe not every inspired expression, but test the inspired expressions to see whether they originate with God" (4:1). One would never suspect from this rendering that "INSPIRED EXPRESSION" translates the same Greek word (pneuma) as "SPIRIT" in 3:24 (see 4:2,3,6). John’s whole point is that although the Spirit’s presence assures us of God’s love, we are not to believe every "spirit" that claims to be from God but test each one by the teachings it prophets espouses. "Because many false prophets have gone out into the world" (4:1). The NWT obscures this point to avoid the implication that God’s Spirit is a person rather than a force (just as the demonic spirits are personal entities and not impersonal forces, as the JW accept).
The same doctrinal bias can be seen in 1 Tim 4:1, where the NWT reads; However, the inspired utterance says…." A straightforward "the SPIRIT says" would too obviously imply the personality of the "Spirit".

Jude 19

"Have the Spirit" changed to "having spirituality."

Similar to Gal. 6:18 above, this revision attempts to obscure the separate presence of the Holy Spirit.

Revelation 3:14

"Ruler of God’s creation" changed to "beginning of the creation by God."

The altered prepositions distract from the sovereignty of Jesus indicated in the passage and suggests that the real power of creation was accomplished through the Father, as the JWs believe that Jesus is a created being.

Jehovah Witness MEO L.A.M. Norman Oetker Missionary "The Light Amidst the Mong/MEO" Hmong Thailand, Reynosa Mexico, English Class, St. Charles Missouri US.